Written by Joshua Prince
The Supreme Court’s decision & market reaction
Unilaterally imposed tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were struck down in a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, finding that the 1977 law does not authorize a president to unilaterally set trade policy of this scope. Equity markets initially responded with relief: the S&P 500 closed higher, and many broader indices followed suit.
That rally was short-lived and soon gave way to renewed concern. As we’ve said before, the administration has plenty of tools at its disposal to rebuild its trade regime, and they haven’t wasted time deploying them. Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 was invoked mere hours after the ruling. Global tariff rates—a form of import fees—had little time to settle at 10% before being pushed to 15% over the weekend, the upper limit under that particular statute.
How President Trump could impose tariffs
Such swift, staggered maneuvers show an eagerness to rebuild what has been lost. This time around it will be done without sweeping powers. Ironically, this piecemeal approach adds another layer of uncertainty. We’ll use a construction as a metaphor. If the IEEPA regime was a single wooden frame raised all at once, the current approach is closer to bricklaying—sections are built up one by one, creating peaks and valleys in effective tariff rates.
The natural side effect of using varied legal methods with different parameters and limitations is that the results are non-uniform. It is this rebuild phase that markets are struggling to price, as staggered progress is difficult to plot out.
It is also worth acknowledging that a flat, predictable tariff rate—however imperfect—is something businesses and supply chains can model. The Liberation Day regime, with its country-by-country variation and revisionary tactics, created an environment where planning grew increasingly difficult. Judging by the European Parliament’s decision to pause ratification of its trade agreement with the U.S., this challenge may be even more pronounced.
A reminder for investors
All in all, this week is a reminder of why patient, diversified portfolios are structured as they are:
- This marks a development, not a resolution. New tariff mechanisms are already in effect, and stilted progress may create winners and losers.
- The legal and economic aftermath of the IEEPA ruling will have lagging effects on corporate balance sheets, trade relationships, and the broader fiscal picture.
- Historically, diversified investors have found themselves better positioned than those attempting to time markets during periods of heightened volatility.
Thankfully, our current positioning reflects the kind of environment we’ve been navigating all along. While volatility can be disruptive, those prepared can be more capable of capturing the opportunities it creates—and the disruption of the past year has created genuine valuation opportunities in high-quality companies whose fundamentals remain intact.
What stays the same & what could change
The United States remains the central player in the global economy, and a single court ruling—or the policy adjustments that follow it—won’t easily rewrite that reality. Trade policy is fluid; investor confidence, when grounded in something real, tends to be more durable than the headlines suggest. Eventually, clarity should emerge, giving markets a signpost to follow.
This evolving situation will require continued attention, but our core philosophy remains unchanged: protect, grow, and steward our clients’ wealth, no matter the circumstances. Remember—investors that thrive are those who prepare ahead of time and don’t need to react so drastically.
Promus Advisors, an SEC-registered investment adviser, is an affiliate of Bellwether Investment Management, Inc. (“Bellwether”). Promus Advisors provides fee-based asset management and advisory services. Bellwether and Promus Advisors have entered into arrangements in which Bellwether may refer clients with financial advisory needs to Promus Advisors. Please note that SEC registration does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor does it indicate that the adviser has attained a particular level of skill. Promus Advisors and its investment adviser representatives are in compliance with the current filing requirements imposed upon SEC-registered investment advisers by those states in which Promus Advisors maintains clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable, equal any corresponding performance level(s), or be suitable for any specific client’s portfolio. Promus Advisors does not guarantee that any benchmark or indices used by Bellwether will match a given portfolio. Furthermore, asset allocation and/or diversification does not necessarily improve an investor’s performance or eliminate the risk of investment loss.